Other unusual prenup clauses include women getting paid per child (again, not a bad idea), and according to one LA lawyer I once spoke to, the stipulation that if you’re the one to leave, you are contractually bound to assist your spouse in finding a new husband or wife of equal or greater physical and spiritual beauty.īut aside from the one we’ve just devised, possibly my favourite – completely unenforceable – prenup clause is the one that requires cheating husbands to hand over a wad of cash for every instance of infidelity. Because love and financial nous don’t have to be mutually exclusive.
After all, “fat clauses” are a thing (as in “I’ll love, honour and obey you as long as you never gain more than 5kg”), with some celebs even specifying amounts they should be paid from their spouses for every extra pound piled on. They’ve probably already been going for decades out there. Hollywood would lap up the idea of “age-discrimination prenups”. Damn right we’re entitled to get some kind of a pay-off. It shouldn’t be our fault if – and I stress if – we get less appealing with age.
#Cheating wife twitter skin#
Besides which, perhaps she can comfort herself with the knowledge that her story – particularly the headline: “Divorcing wife sues for age discrimination” – has seeded an idea that might just be a game-changer for “abandoned” wives for decades to come.įorget the professional aspect: imagine if you could sue your husband simply for leaving you for a younger woman? Preferring the taut, unlined skin and wide-eyed outlook of a 20 or 30-year-old to your wizened and jaded older wife is, without a doubt, a form of age-discrimination. But Mrs Belson did win a claim of unfair dismissal and is now in line to receive compensation from the company. There is, however, a punchline: the nubile young lover 60-year-old Eleanor Belson was convinced her spouse Tim had left her for – turned out to be 63. Have you heard the one about the wife who sued her husband for age discrimination when he left her for a “younger” lover? It’s not actually a joke but a fait divers from the weekend about a British accountant who was so furious when her husband of eleven years left her for another woman – simultaneously making her redundant from his Hatton Garden jewellery business – that she took him to court.
0 kommentar(er)
